[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues
From: |
Jeroen Frijters |
Subject: |
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:36:27 +0200 |
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 21:50, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> > David Lichteblau wrote:
> > > BTW, on the topic of VM* classes: Has there been agreement on
> > > java.lang.VMClass? The proposal was to make its methods
> static (and
> > > possibly add an "Object vmdata" field to java.lang.Class instead).
> >
> > I don't think anybody objected to this proposal. I'd
> definitely would
> > like the vmdata field though.
>
> I would like the vmdata field type then to be VMClass not Object.
IIRC you are the only one to voice this request. I would like it to be
of type Object and I think Jikes RVM as well.
> So if I remember the discussion correctly the idea then is to not call
> the methods on the VMClass object but on static VMClass methods. Do
> these methods then get as parameter the Class object itself or the
> vmdata object?
We would pass the Class instance, that way people who don't want to use
the vmdata instance, can do so.
> And more importantly, who wants to prototype this so we can
> have a real discussion about implementation issues?
I'll see if I can find the time tomorrow.
Regards,
Jeroen
- RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, (continued)
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/03/25
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/03/25
Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Robert Lougher, 2004/03/26
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues,
Jeroen Frijters <=
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/03/28
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/03/28