[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eclipse 3.0 and unimplemented methods proposal
From: |
Andrew John Hughes |
Subject: |
Re: Eclipse 3.0 and unimplemented methods proposal |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Jul 2004 16:51:58 +0100 |
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 04:21, Casey Marshall wrote:
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Andrew> Anyway, the floor is over to you guys. Be gentle ;-) --
> Andrew> Andrew :-)
>
> I think this got as close to an authoritative answer/consensus as we
> can expect to get on this issue:
>
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath/2003-09/msg00226.html>
>
> Stub methods bad. No biscuit.
Aaah -- the change of subject made me miss this one. I do see this as a
bit of a step backwards -- for a stub to have been entered, the
appropriate method signature must have been found, coded and committed.
Also, its mere presence means that the method can be documented and
tested against using Mauve, as well as called from other parts of
Classpath. What is shouldn't do is just die silently.
Anyway, I'm happy to put in the yards to turn the nulls into whichever
of these most people feel happy with -- just be prepared...
Cheers,
--
Andrew :-)
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history.
`Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, (continued)
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, Roman Kennke, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, Andrew John Hughes, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, Dalibor Topic, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0 and unimplemented methods proposal, Andrew John Hughes, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0 and unimplemented methods proposal, Casey Marshall, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0 and unimplemented methods proposal,
Andrew John Hughes <=
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, Andrew Haley, 2004/07/02
Re: Eclipse 3.0, Roman Kennke, 2004/07/02
Re: Eclipse 3.0, Roman Kennke, 2004/07/02