[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: numfmt: minor improvements to --field parsing
|
From: |
Assaf Gordon |
|
Subject: |
Re: numfmt: minor improvements to --field parsing |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Sep 2015 03:00:49 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:53:38PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Usually you would use SIZE_OFLOW in this context,
but here SIZE_MAX is used internally to represent an open ended range,
thus is not allowed as input. Therefore SIZE_MAX is more correct here.
I see, thanks for catching that (I now see you did explictly write
SIZE_MAX in the previous email, sorry for missing it).
The attached patch uses SIZE_MAX instead of SIZE_OFLOW,
and also adds some more comments in 'set-fields()' to about this.
regards,
- assaf
cut-numfmt-set-fields-2015-09-11.patch.xz
Description: Binary data