Re: [Denemo-devel] Final version, with pdf defect?

[Jeremiah Benham]

The gtk3 branch does not yet compile. One thing I am stuck in now is the 
gtksourceview stuff (specifically the string searching stuff). 

If you like I can give you ssh access to a system that you can use to build.

Jeremiah

Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T

Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:

>On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 19:27 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 15:55 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
>> > We can release. The gtk3 stuff is not ready yet
>
>aargh! I was forgetting, this means that the evince stuff will not work
>on any reasonably modern distro. Is there anything in problematic still
>about the gtk3 port? Can I help?
>Also, I should bump the version number of the .denemo file format (well
>I need to check, but I think there are incompatibilities)
>
>Richard
>
>
>
>
>> . We can put it into the release after this one perhaps. So when shall I 
>> create branch 0.9.4? Tarball release this sunday?
>> Well, I'll try and update the docs this week and then we should
>>       * copy the new features to the change log
>>       * create the branch
>>       * upload the candidate tarball to denemo.org
>>       * download and test that it is ok
>>       * final upload to ftp.gnu.org 
>> We could aim for Sunday 13th November if you prefer a weekend, otherwise
>> midweek is generally better for announcements.
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
>> 
>> > 
>> > Jeremiah
>> > 
>> > Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
>> > 
>> > Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > 
>> > >I have run the same LilyPond version under windows and generated the pdf
>> > >http://www.denemo.org/dl31 which displays correctly in evince under
>> > >linux and acrord32 under windows. It is also smaller because I have
>> > >taken out all the point-and-click links.
>> > >I think this is ready to go to press. However, until we make a release,
>> > >very few people will be able to make use of the source file :(
>> > >
>> > >Any enthusiasm for a release?
>> > >
>> > >Richard
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 18:20 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
>> > >> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 11:30 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
>> > >> > On 11/03/2011 08:08 AM, Richard Shann wrote:
>> > >> > > I have uploaded a final version of the Keyboard Polyphony example. 
>> > >> > > The
>> > >> > > pdf is
>> > >> > > http://www.denemo.org/dl29
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > and the source file is
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > http://www.denemo.org/dl30
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > this source has an include file, so you may need to run the Dynamic
>> > >> > > Directive Refresh command before it will print (it is for the book
>> > >> > > titles - re-doing the titles will also work, and nothing is needed 
>> > >> > > if
>> > >> > > you have installed to /usr/local).
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > My PDF reader displays the treble clef wrongly, if you also see 
>> > >> > > this and
>> > >> > > have a recent version of LilyPond can you try re-printing it to see 
>> > >> > > if
>> > >> > > this is a bug that has been fixed. It does not show this problem in 
>> > >> > > 20pt
>> > >> > > font size, only 18 pt.
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > The treble cleff's did look fine for me at 18pt using lilypond 2.12.3.
>> > >> Which viewer program did you use? I downloaded dl29 onto a windows
>> > >> laptop and viewed it in Adobe reader. The treble clef was only slightly
>> > >> broken on the right side of the top loop. The same file viewed with
>> > >> evince and xpdf (which I think use the same underlying library) filled
>> > >> in the top loop of the treble clef in black.
>> > >> 
>> > >> >  
>> > >> > The pdf that you sent had distorted treble cleff's. What version of 
>> > >> > lilypond do you have?
>> > >> lilypond --version
>> > >> GNU LilyPond 2.12.3
>> > >> 
>> > >> So that is quite strange - you get Denemo to generate a pdf via from
>> > >> dl30 and it looks different to dl29, and yet we have the same installed
>> > >> LilyPond... Hmm.
>> > >> I'll try the LilyPond that is installed on my windows laptop.
>> > >> Thanks for the feedback
>> > >> Richard
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > Jeremiah
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > > I have included a better epilog in this version, and fixed the final
>> > >> > > chords to conform with the traditional appearance. The entire file 
>> > >> > > is
>> > >> > > created without inserting any special purpose LilyPond text, that is
>> > >> > > just (now-standard) Denemo commands.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Richard
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > > Denemo-devel mailing list
>> > >> > > address@hidden
>> > >> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > Denemo-devel mailing list
>> > >> > address@hidden
>> > >> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> Denemo-devel mailing list
>> > >> address@hidden
>> > >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>> > >
>> > >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Denemo-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
>