[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Comparison between GNU Radio and FlexRadio
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Comparison between GNU Radio and FlexRadio |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:06:25 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:33:56AM +1300, Ben Hoyt wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm going to be doing some research on digital comms on HF bands, and I'm
> having trouble deciding between the GNU Radio and the FlexRadio as a
> platform. The GNU Radio seems more general-purpose, and the FlexRadio more
> ham-oriented but perhaps more ready-to-go.
>
> So I'm just wondering if there's a comparison between the two somewhere?
>
> Maybe it'd be a good question for the FAQ: "How does GNU Radio compare to
> other SDRs?"
>
> Thanks,
> Ben.
One thing to remember when talking about both GNU Radio and FlexRadio
is that they are each a combination of separable software and hardware.
For HF work, FlexRadio has a nice line of HF hardware and they provide
the PowerSDR software that goes with it. It's possible to talk to
their hardware (last time I checked) using other software. I'm pretty
sure the linux dttsp stuff can use it. There's no reason in
particular that GNU Radio doesn't talk to it. It's just a matter of
programming for somebody that wants the two working together.
Matt's USRP offerings (USRP1, USRP2) don't provide a high-performance
out of the box (narrow band) HF transmitter and receiver. If you wanted to
experiment with signals wider than say 150kHz, then the USRP* would be
useful. I think the QSD in the FlexRadio h/w has an upper bandwidth
limit in the neighborhood of 120 kHz. I'm sure a Flex expert can set
me straight on that part.
Eric