[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++
From: |
dewar |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++ |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:22:47 -0500 (EST) |
<<But this grant-back isn't transferable to customers, so without explicit
permission in the license Apple couldn't give their customers permission
to do something that the license forbids. Still, it's moot, the donated
library would need to have the special exception.
>>
Sure it is! Apple could provide a separate license that allows anyone to do
anything they like. The "pretty much anything" certainly includes the
capability of issuing versions with different licenses.
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), (continued)
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), Markus Grabert, 2001/11/20
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), Markus Grabert, 2001/11/20
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), Pascal Bourguignon, 2001/11/19
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), Dan Pascu, 2001/11/20
- Re: ObjC additions (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++), Balazs Pataki, 2001/11/20
- Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Stan Shebs, 2001/11/19
- Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Ovidiu Predescu, 2001/11/19
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++,
dewar <=
RE: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Bissell, Tim, 2001/11/20
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Stan Shebs, 2001/11/20
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Wim Oudshoorn, 2001/11/20
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Helge Hess, 2001/11/20
Re: PROPOSAL: Objective-C++, Wim Oudshoorn, 2001/11/20