[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: variable declaration
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: variable declaration |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:23:51 +0100 (BST) |
> >> I think Adam already stated that :-)
> >
> > Not really, he said:
> >
> > "If you mean the guideline for GNUstep code, I'd rather not use it.
> > Call me backward, but I still use a 2.95 compiler on a few of my
> > systems :-)"
> >
> > So this means there is a suggestion not to use the feature, but no
> > real guideline.
>
> OK ... I'll chip in.
>
> Adam, Nicola, and myself all think that it's best to keep the old style of
> putting
> variable declarations only at the start of the block.
>
> Irrespective of personal tastes, we all think that it is a good idea to do
> this to
> maintain the ability to build GNUstep with older compilers.
>
> I think you can consider this an 'official' guideline. Certainly I would
> consider
> it a bug to introduce code into the GNUstep libraries which stopped them
> compiling
> with one of the commonly used compilers.
Yes - well said. :-)
- Re: variable declaration, (continued)
- Re: variable declaration, Eric Dahlman, 2002/10/19
- Re: variable declaration, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2002/10/19
- Re: variable declaration, Adam Fedor, 2002/10/19
- Re: variable declaration, Andreas Heppel, 2002/10/21
- Re: variable declaration, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2002/10/21
- Re: variable declaration, Nicola Pero, 2002/10/21
- Re: variable declaration, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2002/10/21
- Re: variable declaration, Adam Fedor, 2002/10/21
- Re: variable declaration, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2002/10/21
- Re: variable declaration, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/10/21
- Re: variable declaration,
Nicola Pero <=
- Re: variable declaration, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2002/10/21
- Re: variable declaration, Nicola Pero, 2002/10/21
Re: variable declaration, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/10/20
Re: variable declaration, David Ayers, 2002/10/19
Re: variable declaration, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/10/19