[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 11:53:01 +0100 |
> So ... how can we decide when to automatically disable procfs? How can
> configure decide
> which BSD variants have which bits of procfs missing?
Is it that bits are missing, or is it that the system is totally
incompatible ? If the former then itsnt it easy to tell which bits
are missing because the files arent present. stat(2)should be able
to detect.
Is there a standard spec for procfs BTW ? Its a Plan9ism isnt it ?
> Also, can Pete confirm that the problem is really with procfs, and not
> simply that +load is
> not being called.
Working on it. I am just trying to see if its that +load is
not being called, or if the combination of ifdefs isnt actually
inserting that method into the source.
Out of interest, why are we doing this in +load and not +initialize ?
-bat.
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, (continued)
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/19
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/06/19
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/19
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Alex Perez, 2003/06/19
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Adam Fedor, 2003/06/19
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/06/20
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc,
Pete French <=
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Pete French, 2003/06/20
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Adam Fedor, 2003/06/20
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Pete French, 2003/06/20
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Pete French, 2003/06/20
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/23
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/23
- Bug reports and tracking tools, was "Re: problems building - Bug reports and tracking tools, was "Re: problems building -, Ian Jones, 2003/06/20
- Re: Bug reports and tracking tools, was "Re: problems building - Bug reports and tracking tools, was "Re: problems building -, Gregory John Casamento, 2003/06/20
Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Fred Kiefer, 2003/06/19