[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:54:16 +0100 (BST) |
> - NeXT/Apple runtime is known/believed to perform better than GNU
> runtime.
Hmmm. Do you have benchmarks ? I'd be interested in them if you have.
I thought this was a confused matter open to discussion, with pros and
cons on each side.
But the Apple runtime performs better on class method invocations - that's
a fact (I hoped to have the time to fill the gap at some point, but I
never found that time <wishful sigh>). The GNU runtime has typed
selectors though, and it's more portable.
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/08
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, David Ayers, 2003/07/08
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/09
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, David Ayers, 2003/07/30
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, Adam Fedor, 2003/07/08
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/07/09
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, Markus Hitter, 2003/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui,
Nicola Pero <=
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, David Ayers, 2003/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, David Ayers, 2003/07/01
Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, David Ayers, 2003/07/01
Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, Markus Hitter, 2003/07/01
Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2003/07/03
Re: [RFC] Header organization of -base & -gui, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2003/07/03