|
From: | Adam Fedor |
Subject: | Re: CVS hosting issues (was: Re: Frameworks integration) |
Date: | Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:50:33 -0700 |
On Tuesday, March 2, 2004, at 03:03 AM, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:35:15 -0800 "Chris B. Vetter" <chrisv@web4inc.com> wrote:| Don't hurt me, but... | | Why don't we split GNUstep core and "kits" and host them on two | different servers? || Keep -core (and everything _closely_ related, like Gorm and Renaissance) | on GNU's CVS and put everything else that can be considered an _add-on_| like said "kits" on a different CVS that has no problem with hosting | projects with mixed licenses?Just trying to clarify, are licenses problems on CVS only ?
Yes.
Savannah accepts all GPL compatible licenses (see https://savannah.gnu.org/register/) So cvs for 'kits' could be on savannah. Inside or outside gnustep tree, I don't know.Technically, I think it would be on savannah.nongnu.org. Currently no one can create new projects, so this will have to wait a little (as with many other savannah problems (sigh!)).
About web domains, I'll prefer xxx.gnustep.org to keep all this as a project.
Yes, That would be nice.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |