[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ./configure --with-installation-domain
From: |
David Ayers |
Subject: |
Re: ./configure --with-installation-domain |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:11 +0100 |
Am Dienstag, den 06.01.2009, 17:55 +0000 schrieb Nicola Pero:
> On 6 Jan 2009, at 17:50, Pete French wrote:
>
> >> No, the whole point of the changes is so that a newbie gets stuff
> >> installed where they expect, so we've altered things to install in
> >> the
> >> local domain by default when building from source, like every other
> >> free software package out there.
> >
> > Where exactly is the 'Local' domain in this case ? I hit
> > a pproblem yesterday where I configured with domainb system - whcih
> > worked
> > fine, but tthen when I tried to build it toold me the domaisn didnt
> > match and re-ran configure/. I never managed toget it compiking
> > properly
> > and ended up copying over and older tree. Slightly bewildered by it
> > to be honest...
>
> Good point. I suppose
>
> ./configure --with-installation-domain=xxx
>
> should also add
>
> GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN = xxx
>
> to the GNUmakefiles.
To which GNUmakefiles?
How should a packager
a) configure [make,base,gui,back]
b) install [make,base,gui,back,gorm,project center]
so that the system packages end up in System yet the user installed
packages end up in Local?
Isn't that the scenario these changes are aimed at?
Cheers,
David
Re: ./configure --with-installation-domain, Nicola Pero, 2009/01/06