[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ANNOUNCE: Terminal v0.9.5

From: Riccardo Mottola
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Terminal v0.9.5
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 23:02:48 +0200


no, I did not consider that option. A patch set is something terrible to
maintain, apply and distribute. Also for the user a patchs et means to have
something against a possibly moving target. Add to that that only recently
work in Backbone resumed, before it was essentially dead, so it made even
less sense.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Zhang Weiwu" <address@hidden>
To: "Gregory John Casamento" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Terminal v0.9.5

Did you also consider releasing it as "GAP patch set for Terminal" as
long as there are only minor changes? Renaming the "fork" creates other
confusion, although a different one.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]