[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [DotGNU]Multi-paradigm programming
From: |
Martin Coxall |
Subject: |
RE: [DotGNU]Multi-paradigm programming |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:21:20 -0000 |
> > > The CLR already has some features that support
> > > multi-paradigm programming. Logic and functional
> > > languages already run on the platform, and can
> > > interface with the regular imperative languages.
>
> There has to be some mapping of semantics of course.
> The program typically repacks the parameters and makes
> a call using the foreign language's calling conventions.
And of course, IL 1.0 is hardly the end of the line for IL: MS already has
research proposals for ILX which add numerous functional and other advanced
language constructs natively to ILX, which will make functional language
support a breeze.
http://research.microsoft.com/projects/ilx/babel01.pdf (PDF)
Martin
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, (continued)
Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Bill Lance, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Bill Lance, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Jens Müller, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Jens Müller, 2001/11/03
- [DotGNU]Multi-paradigm programming, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/03
- RE: [DotGNU]Multi-paradigm programming,
Martin Coxall <=
Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/03
Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Bill Lance, 2001/11/04
RE: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Martin Coxall, 2001/11/05
Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/05