[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful)
From: |
Fergus Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful) |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 06:24:03 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On 28-Feb-2003, Gopal V <address@hidden> wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> > > .file exception__cpp_code.dll
> ...
> >
> > Yes.
>
> unresolved type:
> [mscorlib]System.Runtime.CompilerServices.AssemblyAttributesGoHereSM
> unresolved type:
> [mscorlib]System.Runtime.CompilerServices.AssemblyAttributesGoHere
> exception__cpp_code.dll: unresolved external references
>
> Would this be some other problem or the cause ?
That's a different one.
When an IL file is assembled with /debug, Microsoft's ilasm.exe adds
some attributes to it to indicate this, e.g.
.custom
(['mscorlib']'System.Runtime.CompilerServices'.'AssemblyAttributes GoHere')
instance void
['mscorlib']'System.Diagnostics'.'DebuggableAttribute'::.ctor(bool, bool) = (
01 00 01 01 00 00 )
You can probably just define AssemblyAttributes as an empty class
and DebuggableAttribute as an empty class (or maybe a 6-byte struct)
with the specified "void (bool, bool)" constructor.
--
Fergus Henderson <address@hidden> | "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Fergus Henderson, 2003/02/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Gopal V, 2003/02/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Rhys Weatherley, 2003/02/27