Re: [Duplicity-talk] Unable to restore a recent version

[Nate Eldredge]

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Kenneth Loafman wrote:

> I've been following the discussion.  Yes, it could do that, but it would be
> a much slower process.
>
> ...Ken
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:09 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On 02.06.2011 00:18, Jarno Rantanen wrote:
> > > I don't suppose there's any magic switch that would make Duplicity check
> > the
> > > (hash of the) actual contents of each file instead of its timestamps..?
> > :)
> > > If not, $ touch *.JPG to the rescue.
> >
> > not that i know of. All I know it saves the modtime and checks it on the
> > next run and then uses rsync lib to detect which parts of the file have
> > changed.

But it should be trivial to implement this if you wanted, right?  Just 
remove the modtime test.  It looks like this is in path.py, in 
ROPath:__eq__ and compare_verbose.

--

Nate Eldredge
address@hidden