duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Unable to restore a recent version


From: edgar . soldin
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Unable to restore a recent version
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:39:19 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 02.06.2011 18:30, Oei, YC wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:18, Oei, YC <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I think that's only on Windows, or? On unix, I believe ctime means
>> inode change-time?
>>
>> YC
> 
> I was going to add that this could be problematic for duplicity users
> on Cygwin, but apparently Cygwin emulates unix ctime:
> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-06/msg00436.html
> 

and as it reads ctime is handled in the filesystem itself, so no application 
should actually able to set a fake value. Reconsidering this: Wouldn't it make 
sense to compare ctime instead? To besure we could compare both ctime and mtime.

@ken: opinion?

ede/duply.net



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]