Re: lexical mumblings

[Miles Bader]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> If `load' and `eval-region' just bound the variable `use-lexical-binding'
> to itself (e.g., (let ((use-lexical-binding use-lexical-binding)) ...)),
> Then (use-lexical-binding) could expand into (setq use-lexical-binding t),
> and the interpreted version of `let' could key off that...(!)

Well, obviously this doesn't solve the problem, I was confused.

I would be interested to know the details of how Andrew's interpreted
lexical version of let works -- I think the details will influence how
any larger framework behaves.

-Miles
-- 
97% of everything is grunge