[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
|
Date: |
Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:55:51 -0700 (MST) |
I'm interested in a wrapper kind of extension mechanism (I need
something like that in PCL-CVS...
Please note that PCL-CVS does already work--this change would
only make it cleaner, not help the user.
Developing new abstract programming features so we can make existing
code cleaner is not inherently a bad thing--but it is indeed bad, if
it distracts us from work that is more important. Our priority should
be on making improvements *for the Emacs user*.
Would people please turn their attention in that direction?
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Merging x*, w32* and mac* sources (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/05
- Re: Merging x*, w32* and mac* sources (was Re: table.el), Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/05
- Re: Merging x*, w32* and mac* sources (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/05
- Re: Merging x*, w32* and mac* sources (was Re: table.el), Jason Rumney, 2001/12/05
- Re: Merging x*, w32* and mac* sources (was Re: table.el), William M. Perry, 2001/12/05
- Re: Merging x*, w32* and mac* sources (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/05