[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile
From: |
Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:32:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.5 (broccoli, i386-unknown-freebsd4.6) |
>>>>> "RMS" == Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
RMS> The clean approach is that each of these Lisp variables is simply a
RMS> Scheme variable.
RMS> [...]
RMS> I think it is ugly--variables should remain variables.
Except the variable concepts in Emacs Lisp and Scheme are very
different. Forcing the Emacs Lisp concept upon Scheme would be pretty
ugly and unclean.
Furthermore, I don't see why you think this is necessary. I've seen a
lot of verbiage on this thread, but you haven't been very specific on
this issue. (Maybe I've missed something; if so, I'd ask some kind
soul to rub my nose in that place.)
What exactly is the problem of marking parameter-like dynamic
variables specially and, in Scheme, using different constructs from
Emacs Lisp to bind, set, and access them?
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/20
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Stefan Monnier, 2002/08/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/10
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile,
Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 2002/08/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 2002/08/13
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/15
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/20