[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:40:13 +0300 |
> From: David Abrahams <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:19:56 -0400
> >
> > Maybe you can devise a sequence of function calls from imap.el that
> > show the slowness?
>
> That's a bit beyond me. To really see it in a conclusive way, you
> need to download a message with a large attachment.
Then how about profiling the lengthy operation? See the instructions
in elp.el for more details.
- Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22