Re: ls-lisp and remote files

[Lars Hansen]

Richard Stallman wrote:

> I think would be better, because the result would be cleaner overall,
> if we changed all those ten files.  Are there people who want to do that?
>  
I agree that it would be cleaner.

Let me list the lisp files that I think need to be changed:

     files.el
     ls-lisp.el
     tramp.el
     vc-sccs.el
     fast-lock.el
     server.el
     vc-rcs.el
     find-lisp.el
     info.el
     net/tramp.el
     net/tramp-smb.el
     net/ange-ftp.el
     net/tramp-vc.el
     eshell/esh-util.el
     eshell/em-ls.el
     eshell/em-unix.el
     eshell/em-pred.el
     gnus/nneething.el
     mail/blessmail.el