[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:35:50 +0200 |
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 00:15:06 -0800
>
> Can we get an agreement that adding this new face specifier NCOLORS>=
> is the way to go?
Obviously, I agree. Please wait for a day or two for the other
developers, including Richard Stallman, to respond.
> > The CVS version of xterm.el should support both of them (and also the
> > 16-color variety) already. Doesn't it?
>
> It does. Do we want another NCOLORS>= bracket for 88 color xterms?
> IMHO no.
I suspect that 88 colors should be enough to support all the default
faces nicely. So (assuming this idea gets approved) perhaps using 88
_instead_ of 256 would be good enough.
That would leave us with 16-color terminals, which include the
16-color xterm, rxvt, and the MS-Windows and MS-DOS terminals; and
with 8-color terminals.
What to do with the number of colors between 88 and 16, I don't know.
Perhaps for now just let that behave like 16-color terminals, since we
don't have such devices (AFAIK).
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, (continued)
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/08
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/09
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/12
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/13
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/13
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/14
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/17
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/13
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/09