[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion for autorevert.el
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion for autorevert.el |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:28:10 -0600 (CST) |
>From my previous message:
As a side remark: is there ever any reason to use (buffer-file-name)
instead of just buffer-file-name? I used the latter, which produces
stylistic inconsistency with prior code in autorevert.el. If there
are no objections, I would change the prior code. (The patch below
does not yet do that.)
Actually, I inadvertently sent a version of my patch which _does_
change the two prior occurrences of (buffer-file-name) to buffer-file-name.
Sincerely,
Luc.
Re: Suggestion for autorevert.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/01