[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS |
Date: |
19 May 2004 08:25:08 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: 18 May 2004 15:12:37 -0400
>
> > Hmm... the last garbage-collect that is run at the end of `loadup'
> > says:
>
> > ((48784 . 10021) (10244 . 0) (543 . 60) 69410 144160 (48 . 16) (17 . 12)
> > (4927 . 1814))
>
> > 4900 strings is far too few to explain 40KB growth of pure storage, so
> > where else is the extra storage coming from?
>
> Hmm... that's indeed not right.
> But wait, GC will only report about non-pure objects.
Okay, I will look again.
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, (continued)
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/16
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/17
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Andreas Schwab, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/20
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Michael Mauger, 2004/05/18