Re: next-error refactoring

[Kim F. Storm]

Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> + ;; should we use next-error support?
> + (defcustom dired-next-error-support nil
> +   "Specifies whether Dired should support the next-error
> +   framework."
> +   :group 'dired
> +   :type 'boolean)
> + 

I think dired-use-next-error would be a better name.

First line of doc string should be on one line.
Here is an improved doc string.

(defcustom dired-use-next-error nil
  "Non-nil means to enable `next-error' in dired buffers.
You can then use \\[next-error] to visit the matches
found by `grep-find-dired', `dired-do-search', etc."
  :group 'dired
  :type 'boolean)


-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk