[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incompatible change without "warning"
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Incompatible change without "warning" |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:15:48 -0400 |
For completeness, I guess there should be one for functions too.
We don't add features to Emacs "for completeness".
That is not enough reason.
I see XEmacs has
define-obsolete-function-alias so we could do:
Compatibility adds an additional reason.
So please add define-obsolete-function-alias.
Please give it arguments compatible with XEmacs.
Or we could combine the two e.g
(defmacro define-obsolete-alias (new aliased
Since this does not provide compatibility,
it is not as good. Please don't do this.
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", (continued)
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Eli Zaretskii, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning",
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/26
Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/20
Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/19
Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Eli Zaretskii, 2005/04/19