[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *"
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *" |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:34:35 +0200 |
The FRAME_PTR macro seems not too successful: there are ~1300 uses of
"struct frame *" on 39 files, vs. ~270 uses of FRAME_PTR on 30 files.
Should this be unified, eventually?
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *",
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Kenichi Handa, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29