[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden
From: |
Sam Steingold |
Subject: |
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:49:57 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) |
> * Richard M. Stallman <address@hidden> [2005-12-11 17:57:03 -0500]:
>
> In years past, I actually used gnu.emacs.bug a fair amount to
> report bugs and submit feature requests. If I were just getting
> into Emacs now, I doubt I'd bother, given the state of this
> newsgroup.
>
> I can see why you might hesitate to _read_ a list with a lot of spam,
> but why, rationally, would the amount of spam affect your decision to
> post to the list? I don't see how it makes any difference.
A spam-only mailing list will not be read by a sensible person, as you
yourself concede, so why would a sensible person post to a list that is
not read by sensible people?
--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
http://www.iris.org.il http://www.jihadwatch.org/ http://www.dhimmi.com/
http://pmw.org.il/ http://truepeace.org http://www.mideasttruth.com/
Programming is like sex: one mistake and you have to support it for a lifetime.
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Alan Mackenzie, 2005/12/12
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/12
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Ken Raeburn, 2005/12/13
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Alan Mackenzie, 2005/12/13
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden,
Sam Steingold <=
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/12