[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: hyperlinks in variable's value - links to libraries
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: hyperlinks in variable's value - links to libraries |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Jan 2006 07:38:55 -0800 |
> Yes, of course. However, in practice, it works quite well...
I don't think it does.
> The problem of multiple names of different types is pretty
> well handled by ordering (priority) - see the code I sent.
When I tried it it linked to a function if there was one, and only to a
library if there was no function with the same name.
Yes. I found that works well, in practice. The priority could be changed, of
course, but a function foo in a library foo is generally a tighter focus, so
a better bet on average.
This is the way the code already worked, for dealing with function and
variable names. I just added library names.
As I said, mixes of either function or variable names and library names are
uncommon in *Help* buffers. You might get the occasional foo function or
variable being linked to, instead of foo library, in the `features' list,
but that is not a big problem, because you still end up in the library code
(via one more link, "defined in foo").
- RE: hyperlinks in variable's value - links to libraries, (continued)