[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Risky local variable mechanism
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Risky local variable mechanism |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:17:02 -0600 (CST) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
The automatic/interactive part of what I propose would be things that are
only set by the user, so custom could be OK for them.
So I may have misunderstood your proposal. You actually propose an
alist whose elements look like (myvar nil t), meaning that the set of
safe values of myvar is (nil t)?
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, (continued)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/07
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/08
- Disabled commands (was: Risky local variable mechanism), Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Disabled commands (was: Risky local variable mechanism), Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Disabled commands, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/09
- Re: Disabled commands, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: Disabled commands, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/10