[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:43:00 +0300 |
> From: Bill Wohler <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:54:59 -0700
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Again, this is 170KB growth, certainly not a negligible amount of
> > memory.
>
> That growth is .35% of my 48 MB Emacs process, so for what it's worth,
> *I* think it's negligible ;-).
It's not negligible if you have a program other than Emacs that needs
to run and starts paging because it's 150KB short of its memory usage.
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), (continued)
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Bill Wohler, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Bill Wohler, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), David Kastrup, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Robert J. Chassell, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/24
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/23