[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mode loaded twice with Local Variables
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Mode loaded twice with Local Variables |
Date: |
Wed, 10 May 2006 13:50:26 -0400 |
How about this? It seems simpler to me.
Davis
I think this kind of change is ok for now.
Is there some reason i-f isn't used? Is it just to
avoid errors for unfbound symbols?
We're going to call the function and get the error anyway.
What if the major mode was itself an
alias, or does that not happen?
It could, so the code should do indirect-function on both of them
and compare the results.
Re: Mode loaded twice with Local Variables, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/09