[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: line-move-partial too costly ?

From: Michaël Cadilhac
Subject: Re: line-move-partial too costly ?
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:58:33 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:
>> I don't think my computer, with an Athlon XP 2000+, is too old to not
>> be concerned by Emacs user-friendliness :-)
>> With emacs -Q, if I entirely  fill the scratch buffer (150 columns, 75
>> lines) and then  press C-n and _stay on it_,[1]  the cursor is blocked
>> at the second line. When C-n is released, Emacs responds only after
>> a second or so.
> Something seems very strange -- I'm on a slower computer than you, but
> see absolutely no slowdown in the above scenario....  This is true
> whether I use -q or not.

Thanks for testing! Did you use a particular keyboard rate? With the
default X one, I don't have this problem.

/!\ My mail address changed, please update your files accordingly.
 |      Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac   |  Isn't vi that text editor with        |
 |         Epita/LRDE Promo 2007   |   two modes... One that beeps and      |
 |  http://michael.cadilhac.name   |     one that corrupts your file?       |
 `--  -   JID: address@hidden --'           -- Dan Jacobson         -  --'

Attachment: pgpqNA01yLVdm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]