[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Keybinding nit
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Keybinding nit |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:56:57 -0400 |
C-x 4 0 and C-x 5 0 are not at all symmetric, and C-x 4 0 is not
really intuitive.
Maybe one should rather have C-x 4 k and C-x 5 k for killing both
buffer and window/frame?
Since C-x k reads a buffer name, I would expect C-x 4 k to
read a buffer name also.
- Keybinding nit, David Kastrup, 2006/10/18
- Re: Keybinding nit, Peter Lee, 2006/10/18
- Re: Keybinding nit, Miles Bader, 2006/10/18
- Re: Keybinding nit, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/10/19
- Re: Keybinding nit, Miles Bader, 2006/10/22
- Re: Keybinding nit, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/10/24
- Re: Keybinding nit, Miles Bader, 2006/10/24
- Re: Keybinding nit, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/10/25
Re: Keybinding nit,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Keybinding nit, Jan D., 2006/10/20
Re: Keybinding nit, David Kastrup, 2006/10/20
RE: Keybinding nit, Drew Adams, 2006/10/20