[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Keybinding nit
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Keybinding nit |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:37:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
C-x 4 0 and C-x 5 0 are not at all symmetric, and C-x 4 0 is not
really intuitive.
Maybe one should rather have C-x 4 k and C-x 5 k for killing both
buffer and window/frame?
That would be quite closer to
C-x k RET C-x 0
and
C-x k RET C-x 5 0
in my opinion.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Keybinding nit,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Keybinding nit, Peter Lee, 2006/10/18
- Re: Keybinding nit, Miles Bader, 2006/10/18
- Re: Keybinding nit, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/10/19
- Re: Keybinding nit, Miles Bader, 2006/10/22
- Re: Keybinding nit, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/10/24
- Re: Keybinding nit, Miles Bader, 2006/10/24
- Re: Keybinding nit, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/10/25
Re: Keybinding nit, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/19