[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:07:16 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:31:56 -0800
> From: Steve Kargl <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 06:31:54AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > If you still think this will hamper GFortran, please show some
> > specific examples of what your format allows, while the ``GNU
> > standard'' (in the meaning I mentioned above) does not.
>
> UTSL
What for? so you'd reject it flat?
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Tobias Burnus, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, FX Coudert, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/31