[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Steve Kargl |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:10:22 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:26:36AM +0100, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>
>
> The only difference between G77 anf GFortran seems the line (<==).
>
> Why is it so hard for GFortran add that line?
You again have chosen a simple case.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
# This archive contains:
#
# l.inc
# l.f90
#
echo x - l.inc
sed 's/^X//' >l.inc << 'END-of-l.inc'
X integer i
END-of-l.inc
echo x - l.f90
sed 's/^X//' >l.f90 << 'END-of-l.f90'
Xprogram a
X include 'l.inc'
X call i(j)
Xend program a
END-of-l.f90
exit
laptop:kargl[219] gfc -c l.f90
In file l.inc:1
Included at l.f90:2
integer i
1
In file l.f90:3
call i(j)
2
Error: 'i' at (1) has a type, which is not consistent with the CALL at (2)
Is "NO" some difficult concept for you to understand?
There are real, hard to fix bug, in bugzilla. I think
the gfortran developers time is better spent on real
problems.
--
Steve
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, FX Coudert, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran,
Steve Kargl <=
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, François-Xavier Coudert, 2006/10/30