[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:01:34 -0500 |
Actually, that is already the case for (at least) `concat':
Stefan argues that modifying strings is not common; nonetheless I
worry that this optimization as currently implemented constitutes a
bug. Maybe we should make the compiled code copy the string each
time.
Would someone like to implement that?
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, (continued)
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/14
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Herbert Euler, 2006/11/14
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/16
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Herbert Euler, 2006/11/30
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/30
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Herbert Euler, 2006/11/14
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Miles Bader, 2006/11/15
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/15
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Johan Bockgård, 2006/11/15
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/15
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/16
- Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Johan Bockgård, 2006/11/24
Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/14
Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/13
RE: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines, Herbert Euler, 2006/11/14