[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display'
From: |
Daniel Brockman |
Subject: |
Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display' |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:09:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux) |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> The `*' and `?' characters have `invisibile' properties
>> with a value of `t', so I expect to see none of them.
>>
>> The `?' characters all have `display' properties with a
>> value of "!" (one of them has "$" instead, for clarity).
>> This, I believe, _should_ be irrelevant.
>
> The `display' text property overrides `invisible'.
If that were true, then all the `?' characters should
display as exclamation marks, but they don't, so the
`display' text property does not override `invisible'.
This still looks like a bug to me.
Let me state again what I see: The `display' property
overrides `invisible' if and only if the previous character
is visible. How is this reasonable or useful in any way?
--
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden>
- Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', Chong Yidong, 2007/02/12
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display',
Daniel Brockman <=
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', David Kastrup, 2007/02/13
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/13
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/21
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/22
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', David Kastrup, 2007/02/22
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/22
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', David Kastrup, 2007/02/22
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/22
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', Johan Bockgård, 2007/02/22
- Re: Invisibility bug: `invisible' vs `display', David Kastrup, 2007/02/22