[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:42:32 -0400 |
> Why not? It seems that the character should be decoded by visiting
> the file, and converted into the proper character code.
That part is ok. The problem is that the current Windows
code generates an event M-\351 instead of M-é.
Isn't that a bug? It ought to handle the é the same regardless of
the modifiers.
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/25
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31