[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS is the `released version'
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: CVS is the `released version' |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2007 17:22:27 -0400 |
rms> It seems that part of your motivation for wanting a package system is
rms> to move Emacs development in a direction that weakens the FSF's
rms> ability to develop Emacs as an FSF-copyrighted package.
rms> This confirms my concern about the downside.
I was a bit surprised, and I suppose a little hurt, to read this.
Please ask about my motives rather than try to infer what they might
be.
I apologize -- I should not have spoken about motivation.
But it does seem that the goal you stated would entail
this result.
- Re: CVS is the `released version', (continued)
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/30
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version' (ELL and the ohio lisp archive), Stephen Eglen, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/24
- New Extensions (was: Re: CVS is the `released version'), Henrik Enberg, 2007/05/24
- Re: CVS is the `released version',
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Robert J. Chassell, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', jasonr, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Robert J. Chassell, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Robert J. Chassell, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Robert J. Chassell, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Jason Rumney, 2007/05/22