[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:58:20 +0200 |
On 10/10/07, Eric S. Raymond <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hm. Even if there are other version-controlled files beneath the
> current directory?
Well, I'm not sure about this case, I'd have to think it over. I
suppose that such behavior would make sense when asking for vc-diff in
dired, or selecting a directory in some way. But vc-diff in a buffer
visiting a file *not* under version-control... no, I wouldn't expect a
tree search.
Anyway, I have no version-controlled files in my %HOME dir or beneath
it, and C-x v = while editing the .emacs file now tries to do some
version-control processing (with predictably bad results), while
before it just said: "File c:/home/.emacs is not under version
control", which seems sensible.
I'm not saying my view is the only one reasonable, but to me the
current behavior is a regression.
> I think people are likely to become quite upset with me if I
> remove that.
Then at the very least make it a user option, please.
Juanma
- vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/14
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Andreas Schwab, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11