[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another VC terminology change?
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Another VC terminology change? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:37:28 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
> I think we don't want to restrict the term "file set" to the specific one
> corresponding to filesets.el. Instead, we want to keep it as a fairly
> abstract concept, with uses in filesets and VC and other packages
> (project.el comes to mind although it doesn't refer to it explicitly).
>
> So, I'd distinguish between "file set" as the general concept, and "VC
> fileset" and (filesets.el's) "Fileset" as specific instantiations.
That is exactly my position. Well put,
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, (continued)
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Miles Bader, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/13
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/14
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/18
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/19
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/21
Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/12