|
From: | Juri Linkov |
Subject: | Re: recording-elisp.el - try recording commands as elisp code |
Date: | Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:46:22 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I think I should install my C patch that adds a new variable >> this-command-args. This will allow you to continue freely implementing >> this feature. > > Do you mean you'll make the C patch available on CVS? I don't catch the > exact meaning of the word 'install' here. Yes, by `install' I meant to check in the C patch into CVS. >> I suggest you to give a shorter name to this package (e.g. record-lisp.el) >> and to use the same prefix for all function and variable names. > > Yes I thought about this. But "record-lisp-" looks too long as a prefix > while "record-" is too general a word that can be mistaken for other > things. I've not come up with a good one yet. > > Any suggestion are welcome here regarding the names. For instance, `reclisp-' is a short prefix. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |