[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
supporting older versions of emacs (was: Re: bootstrap fails AND how abo
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
supporting older versions of emacs (was: Re: bootstrap fails AND how about fixing the byte-compiler?) |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:47:30 -0800 |
Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:
> Anyhow, it seems the best solution for cc-vars.el right now (after all,
> it's got to work with Emacs 2[01] and various flavours of XEmacs, too),
> is to change c-constant-symbol into a macro.
It's obviously your choice, but is it worth it to still support
emacs-20?
21.1 was released in October 2001.
Is the number of people that do not upgrade to emacs-21, but still want
to use the latest cc-mode significant enough to be worth the trouble?
- bootstrap fails, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2008/01/14
- Re: bootstrap fails AND how about fixing the byte-compiler?, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/01/15
- Re: bootstrap fails AND how about fixing the byte-compiler?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/15
- Re: bootstrap fails AND how about fixing the byte-compiler?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2008/01/15
- supporting older versions of emacs (was: Re: bootstrap fails AND how about fixing the byte-compiler?),
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: supporting older versions of emacs, Glenn Morris, 2008/01/16
- Re: supporting older versions of emacs, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/01/16
- Re: supporting older versions of emacs, Reiner Steib, 2008/01/16
- Re: supporting older versions of emacs, Glenn Morris, 2008/01/16
- Re: supporting older versions of emacs, Reiner Steib, 2008/01/16
- Re: supporting older versions of emacs (was: Re: bootstrap fails AND how about fixing the byte-compiler?), Alan Mackenzie, 2008/01/16
- Re: supporting older versions of emacs (was: Re: bootstrap fails AND how about fixing the byte-compiler?), Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/16