[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:32:35 -0500 |
> I think you have the wrong picture of the issue.
That implies that there is only one right picture.
I don't know whether there is more than one right picture, but you're
using the wrong one. To approach things that way would be contrary to
the responsibilities of a GNU package maintainer. It is out of the
question. To argue for that just shows you don't understand.
Using a package is not the same as supporting it: it actually places
additional burdens on its developers.
That is too narrow a picture of "support". Using a package is a vital
form of support.
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, (continued)
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/27
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, David Kastrup, 2008/01/27
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Johan Bockgård, 2008/01/27
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/28
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/28
- GNU Project [was: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like], Nick Roberts, 2008/01/28
- Re: GNU Project [was: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like], Richard Stallman, 2008/01/28
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/28
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, David Kastrup, 2008/01/28
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/01/28
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Thomas Lord, 2008/01/25
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/29