|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: testing for a remote file to include file on a Windows mapped drive |
Date: | Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:21:50 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> > Could someone please summarize what was done about this? >> Nothing. > Could you (someone) explain why nothing was done? Was it because it > was decided that: It was a silly problem and request (no need)? No > idea how to fix it? No resources to fix it? Someone is still working > on it? AFAIK, it's a difficult problem, and it's not very high up on the priority. > Assuming for the moment that there is no intention to do anything > about it, can someone at least weigh in on the code I sent (which I'm > still using)? Suggestions for improvement? > What about the question wrt `file-remote-p' and `ffap-remote-p'? ffap-file-remote-p seems to be incompatible with file-remote-p because it is also used to "normalize" file names and is applied to URLs even when url-handler-mode is not loaded. Maybe we should add to file-remote-p something equivalent to ffap-rfs-regexp. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |