[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pretest, devel and bug lists
From: |
Richard M Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: pretest, devel and bug lists |
Date: |
Fri, 30 May 2008 22:07:40 -0400 |
What does that mean? The thread generated by a bug report is presumably
a mixture of technical discussion and admin related to the tracker.
That is exactly what I do not want. I do not want to get all the
canned administrative messages, and I don't think anyone else does
either.
The person who reported a bug, and the persons who send commands to
the bug tracker about it, probably do want to get the administrative
messages about that bug. But bug-gnu-emacs should not get them.
How
does someone following bug-gnu-emacs know that a bug report has been closed
if he only sees part of the thread.
People usually send a message saying "Yes, that change fixed it." You
would get the information that way, and you would not need the canned
message.
If he wants to see those messages, he can subscribe to a new list
where they are sent. That is easy.
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, (continued)
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Nick Roberts, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Don Armstrong, 2008/05/28
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/29
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Don Armstrong, 2008/05/29
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/30
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Don Armstrong, 2008/05/30
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Nick Roberts, 2008/05/30
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/30
- Re: pretest, devel and bug lists,
Richard M Stallman <=
Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Don Armstrong, 2008/05/27
Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Chong Yidong, 2008/05/27
Re: pretest, devel and bug lists, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/27