[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:49:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> vc-dir (previous "vc-status") is very much a work in progress, as you've
>> seen.
> In that case, do you think premature to remove vc-directory which was better
> at doing some of the things vc-dir should do?
AFAIK, it has the same "commit in foreground" and "no way to update the
whole direcrory" problem. VC-dir is missing some features, but which
ones (other than the obvious ones from dired which probably won't be
added to vc-dir anyway) were present in vc-dired?
Stefan
PS: Has vc-dired been removed already?
- vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/05