[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:12:42 +1200 |
> > In that case, do you think [it was] premature to remove vc-directory which
> > was better at doing some of the things vc-dir should do?
>
> AFAIK, it has the same "commit in foreground" and "no way to update the
> whole direcrory" problem. VC-dir is missing some features, but which
> ones (other than the obvious ones from dired which probably won't be
> added to vc-dir anyway) were present in vc-dired?
vc-dir always needs the repository (even when vc-stay-local is t), mouse-2
doesn't visit files, vc-dir isn't documented (but vc-directory is)...
>
> Stefan
>
>
> PS: Has vc-dired been removed already?
Yes:
2008-05-07 Eric S. Raymond <address@hidden>
* vc.el, vc-dispatcher.el: VC-Dired support removed.
Sometimes removing a old feature might encourage people to use the new one
but other times it might just make people use an old version of Emacs.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05